Research PortalResearch Platforms and Portals (RPP) Competition

French

 

Competition Opens Submission Deadline
September 27, 2018 November 8, 2018, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time

Extension of this deadline is not possible.

The Research Platforms and Portals (RPP) Competition enables communities to develop research projects that improve access to shared datasets, enhance existing online research tools and facilities, or advance national or international research collaborations.

Please read this year’s guide carefully to learn more about how to apply to the 2019 RPP Competition. If you have questions, please consult our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page or email rac@computecanada.ca. For questions about the terminology, please consult the Compute Canada Technical Glossary.

For more information about other Compute Canada Resource Allocation Competitions, please see our main Resource Allocation Competitions page or email rac@computecanada.ca.

Table of Contents

Definition of a Research Platform or Portal
Eligibility
Submission Procedures & Deadlines
Application Form
Allocation Process
Questions and Additional Information
Appendix A: Scientific Evaluation Criteria and Scoring Matrix
Appendix B: Privacy Policy

Definition of a Research Platform or Portal

A Research Platform or Portal is a community-developed set of tools, applications, and data that are integrated via a gateway or a suite of applications, usually in a graphical user interface, that is further customized to meet the needs of a specific community.

Platforms and portals enable entire communities of users associated with a common discipline to use national resources through a common interface.

Note: RPP 2019 is focussed solely on scientific gateways. Pure compute requests should apply to the Resources for Research Groups (RRG) Competition.

Eligibility

This competition is open to researchers based at Canadian academic institutions who are eligible to apply for funding to the federal granting agencies.

Projects applying for the RPP Competition must also:

  1. Provide resources to a larger research community via a set of cloud-based tools, applications, and/or data, thus enabling them to access national resources via a common interface.
  2. Be able to develop, operate and manage the proposed portal or platform with minimal support from Compute Canada.

Generally, an RPP project will involve cloud resources, usually through the development of a front-end gateway on persistent virtual machines, with possible backend compute either through cloud compute nodes or job-based submission to the large national Compute Canada clusters. Additionally, many platforms and portals include large databases.

Important: If backend compute resources are required for this project, they should be included in the RPP application.

Co-PIs and Collaborators

In the context of this competition, Co-PIs are any co-lead investigators in your project with a Compute Canada account. Note that both the PI and any Co-PI listed in an application MUST upload an updated CCV with their application (see CCV Requirement section.) International investigators or colleagues without a Compute Canada account can be listed as “collaborators” at the discretion of the lead PI.

Multi-Year Awards

Allocations may be awarded over multiple years (maximum of three years), subject to an annual review and availability of resources.

Multiple Platforms / Portals

Applicants are welcome to combine related platforms or portals into a single application (preferred), or may submit multiple RPP applications (i.e. one per portal/platform) if needed. Applicants may also apply for the RPP and RRG competitions at the same time.

Minimum Requests

Only applications needing more than the amounts below will be accepted:

  • Compute >= 50* Core Year, OR
  • Storage >= 10 TBs, OR
  • GPUs >= 10 GPU years, OR
  • Cloud Compute >= 80 VCPUs, OR
  • Persistent Cloud >= 10 VCPUs, OR
  • Cloud storage >= 1 TB

*If you require <50 core years but high memory per core, please use the following formula to calculate the Core Year Equivalent to know whether you should submit an application or use the Rapid Access Service (RAS) for your compute needs.

Core Equivalent =MAX(cores, mem requested / 4GB)
Mem requested = CY* mem per core requested

For more information about compute allocations, core equivalent and scheduler priority, please visit this page.

Please note that Compute Canada resources are limited and thus applications may be scaled based on supply and demand. Please refer to the Appendix at the end of this Guide for the RPP Evaluation Criteria.

If your resource needs are less than the limits mentioned above, you should use Compute Canada’s Rapid Access Service and do not need to submit an RPP application.

Return to Table of Contents

Submission Procedures and Deadlines

Proposals must be submitted electronically through the CCDB no later than November 8, 2018 at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time.

Following the review process, applicants will be informed regarding the status of their applications via e-mail in Spring 2019.

Pre-Submission Consultations

Applicants are encouraged to consult with Compute Canada technical staff prior to submitting a proposal by emailing rac@computecanada.ca.

Note: If you are applying for the first time to this competition, we strongly encourage you to consult with us prior to submitting your application. This step is very important to ensure you are applying for the correct competition (RRG vs RPP).

Consultations must happen prior to October 31, 2018, to allow adequate time for support by Compute Canada technical staff.

Return to Table of Contents

Online Application Form

All applications to the RPP Competition are submitted online via the CCDB (Compute Canada Database). Users must log in using an existing Compute Canada account or register for a new account.


CCV Requirement

The Canadian Common CV (CCV) is required for the scientific review process of all RAC applications and is also important for Compute Canada’s reporting to our funders. Please consult the CCV Submission Guide for further instructions.

The lead PI and all co-PIs are required to:

  • Upload an up-to-date CCV with any RAC application.
  • Report publications enabled by your use of Compute Canada resources.

Important:

  • If a CCV on file is less than 1 year old, uploading a new CCV is optional.
  • If a CCV on file is older than one year, a new CCV must be uploaded.

The lead-PI will be able to view in the online form the date in which any CCV linked to the application was last uploaded and whether any action is required.

Please plan ahead to avoid delays or the risk of missing the submission deadline due to this requirement.

Requesting Resources

Remember to fill-in the online application form with all of your requests. There should be no discrepancies between what you request in the Resource Justification document attached to your application and what you request in the online form. In case of discrepancy, the online form will prevail.

Please visit the Available Resources page for a list of systems available for this competition and to know how resources must be requested in the online form.

Strategic Plan and Resource Justification

Please use the following template for the required Resource Justification and Strategic Plan document that must be submitted with your online application. This document MUST be submitted in .pdf format.

Download Template (Word) Download Template (LaTeX)

Return to Table of Contents

Allocation Process

The overall allocation process follows these stages:

  1. Compute Canada technical staff review each proposal.
  2. An Expert Review Committee evaluates each proposal, and each proposal receives multiple independent scientific reviews.
  3. Expert Review Committee meets to discuss the applications and gives a final science score based on a 5-point scale.
  4. The Chairs of the Expert Review Committees endorse a scaling function based on the science score. That scaling function is applied to all compute requests.
Technical Review

The technical review is conducted by Compute Canada staff who will:

  • ensure the appropriate system is requested by the PI and the required software is available;
  • evaluate application efficiency and scalability;
  • identify groups that may need help with application and workflow optimization;
  • identify discrepancies between the online request and the complete description of the project;
  • identify special software requirements;
  • provide a technical opinion on the reasonability of the request;
  • provide an opinion on the capability of the team to develop, operate and manage the platform or portal.

Note: During the technical review process, staff may require additional information from applicants and will engage them directly. In order to ensure an application can progress beyond the Technical Review, applicants are expected to respond to requests from the Compute Canada technical team within 48 hours of the request.

Science Review

All applications submitted to the Compute Canada Resource Allocation Competitions are peer-reviewed and scored. Please note that the main purpose of this review process is to:

  1. Obtain expert opinion about the overall scientific merit and feasibility of the proposed research project(s);
  2. Evaluate the appropriateness of the requested resources for the research project(s);
  3. Provide feedback to the applicants.

The main outcome of this process is an overall score for each application. These scores are used to scale and determine the final allocations to ensure fairness and effective use of Compute Canada resources.

Please refer to the Appendix at the end of this Guide for the RPP Evaluation Criteria.

A scaling function, endorsed by the Chairs of the Expert Review Committees, is applied to compute requests to provide a means by which decisions on RAC allocations in a context of insufficient capacity can be made. For the RAC 2018, this function was set so that only applications with a science score of 2.0 or higher received an allocation, with a maximum of 83% of their total allocation request being met for those with a score of 5.  Visit the 2018 Resource Allocations Competition Results page for more details about the scaling function and other RAC stats.

We understand that some applicants may have already undergone an evaluation through the various granting councils. It is not the goal of this review process to evaluate and score a PI’s complete research program as an overlap to what the granting agencies have done. Rather, the goal is to determine how to accommodate such projects as best as possible given the limited resources available.

Return to Table of Contents

Questions and Additional Information

For any questions on the RRG Competition, please contact us at rac@computecanada.ca.

You may also wish to consult our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page or the Compute Canada Technical Glossary.

For more information about other Compute Canada Resource Allocation Competitions, please see our main Resource Allocation Competitions page.

Feel free to  also contact your regional support team:

ACENET:

support@acenet.ca 

Quebec:

support@calculquebec.ca

Ontario:

CAC: cac.help@queensu.ca  

SciNet: support@scinet.utoronto.ca

SHARCNET: help@sharcnet.ca

WestGrid: rac@westgrid.ca

Return to Table of Contents

APPENDIX A: Scientific Evaluation Criteria and Scoring Matrix

Scientific Evaluation Criteria

Merit of the Strategic Plan (40%)

Considerations for the evaluation of the Strategic Plan include the following:

Research Problem and Justification

  • The research problem or need that the platform/portal will address is clearly presented.
  • The importance/relevance of the platform/portal for Canada is well justified.
  • The general objectives of the platform/portal are clear.

Goal, Alignment and Impact

  • The project goal is clearly stated and aligns with the goals of Compute Canada.
  • The research area of focus is of importance and will generate benefits to Canada.
  • The expected impacts have been clearly explained.

Use of the Platform/Portal

  • The applicant has clearly explained the added value from the creation of the proposed platform or portal for the identified communities.
  • Creation of the research platform/portal is being driven by the research community targeted.
  • If applicable – The application details the level of interaction between Canadian and international research groups.

Expected Outcomes

  • The application presents a clear timeline for the delivery of the anticipated outcomes over the entire duration of the requested allocation and has indicated the means by which they will be measured.
  • The outcomes presented are of relevance and importance, and will benefit the users of the platform/portal.
Merit of the Management Plan (50%)

Evaluate the quality of the team assembled to manage, develop and operate the platform. Considerations of this criteria include:

Development and Operations of the Platform/Portal

  • The team assembled to develop and operate the platform have the right combination of skills (where positions are not yet filled, a description of the position has been included).
  • The proposed methods and technologies are suitable and scientifically justified for the services to be provided by the platform.
  • The approach to sharing data sets across the platform/portal is well detailed and the application addresses any potential accessibility issues.

Management of the Platform/Portal

  • The team assembled to manage the platform have the right combination of skills (where positions are not yet filled, a description of the position has been included).
  • The proposed management of the resources is well defined and will provide broad access to the research communities.
  • The process for resource access is well defined and the application identifies a credible plan to maintain or increase the population accessing resources.
  • If applicable, the scientific evaluation of selecting projects will result in supporting excellent research with the resources available.
  • The reporting framework presented will ensure information collected on the users of the portal will provide the ability to track impacts (scientific, HQP, social, etc.) and the participants are maximizing the benefits of the resources to meet the expected outcomes of the application.
Highly Qualified Personnel (10%)
  • The project will generate significant benefits to HQP and has outlined these benefits in the application.
  • The anticipated number of HQP participating in the platform/portal has been clearly delineated across academic levels.
  • The platform/portal will create unique training opportunities for the participating HQP.
  • The application identifies strong examples of cross-pollination between HQP disciplines resulting from the platform/portal.

Scoring matrix
Descriptor Score
Exceptional 5
Outstanding 4
Very Strong 3
Strong 2
Moderate 1
Insufficient 0

 

Return to Table of Contents

APPENDIX B: Privacy Policy

Confidentiality of Information

Compute Canada safeguards the information it receives from applicants. All reviewers are required to sign a Nondisclosure Agreement and Compute Canada’s Conflict of Interest policy, and they are instructed to keep all proposal information confidential and to use it only for review purposes. All proposals will be available for review by all Compute Canada reviewers and the RAC Administrative committee.

Use of Personal Information

Any personal information collected by Compute Canada is used only to review applications. Such information may be shared with relevant officials in the relevant consortium and/or with their research institution.

Public Information

If approved for an allocation, Compute Canada will post the following project information on our website:

Full name of the lead PI
Department/Institution/Organization
Platform or Portal Title
Project Summary
Allocation

Return to Table of Contents

Top